Abstract: The research objective of the article is the substantiation of methodological and applied recommendations for improving deposit guarantee system in Ukraine in view of the international experience. The study object is the deposit guarantee system management in the framework of reforming the Ukrainian legislation aimed at establishing a mechanism of deposits guaranteeing. During the research there were used such methods as: dialectical method and methods of analysis and synthesis – to study the features of deposit guarantee systems of developed countries, the characteristics of mechanism for returning deposits and international law peculiarities; statistical method – to analyze the indicators of banking system in Ukraine and credit unions (CU), for empirical determining CU to banks indicator ratio as well; structural and logical analysis – to develop theoretical and methodological principles of forming effective deposits guaranteeing mechanism in Ukraine. The need to ensure the system of deposits guaranteeing not only to individuals but also to individual-private entrepreneurs and legal entities was established. This will facilitate the development of small and medium businesses in the country. There were analyzed peculiarities of credit unions activity in Ukraine in the context of reforming the banking system. The possibility of including the credit unions to the deposit guarantee system of Ukraine by the example of the EU countries and the world was substantiated. There were characterized necessary amendments to the national legislation in the field of deposit guaranteeing and the effective mechanisms for their implementation were proposed
<a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.15611/fins.2018.1.01">DOI: 10.15611/fins.2018.1.01</a>
<p>Keywords: Deposit Guarantee System, Deposit Guarantee Fund, household deposit, deposit ensuring, credit unions (CU).
</p>
<h2>1. Introduction</h2>
<p>The state deposit insurance system is not common everywhere in the world. The bankruptcy of the banks ceased to be a
rare occurrence, as evidenced by the crises of the last decades. But the savings depositors need to return loss
somehow – offset, in such cases, their mission is to fulfill the deposit insurance system.</p>
<p>A similar system operates in nearly 70 countries around the world, the rest are on the stage of careful preparation
for its creation. In China, this system started functioning in March last year. Almost in every state there are some
nuances and features of the deposit insurance organization. In general there are 4 basic types of systems that can be
considered as an example for our country.</p>
<p>National Bank of Ukraine continues the cleaning of the financial system – market exit of the banks, with a
significant reduction in the number of participants in the financial system. Dozens of banks are liquidated, their
customers − physical persons are compensated within 200,000 hryvnias (UAH), while investors − legal entities do not
have any guarantees to protect their funds in the banks.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, in developed countries the guarantee on bank deposits is also associated with legal entities. Without such
guarantees it is impossible to imagine the formation of a stable and strong middle class. The main question is under
what circumstances it is possible to create a system of guarantees for deposits which would apply to all depositors of
banks. If we plan to create a stable and reliable banking system in Ukraine, this issue will sooner or later be
discussed at the highest governing level.</p>
<p>The system of deposit guarantee in Ukraine operates according to the Law of Ukraine “On Households Deposit Guarantee
System” of February 23, 2012, <br />Ref. number 4452-VI.</p>
<p>The purpose of this Law is to protect the rights and legitimate interests of bank depositors, strengthen the public
trust in the Ukrainian banking system, stimulate investments in the Ukrainian banking system, and ensure an efficient
procedure of insolvent bank resolution and liquidation of banks [The Law of Ukraine “On Households… 2012].</p>
<p>The Deposit Guarantee Fund (hereinafter – DGF) is a specialized government institution of public administration in
the sphere of deposit guarantee and bank resolution. The fund is established with the purpose of protecting the rights
of individual depositors (natural persons) in the Ukrainian banks. The major objective of the fund is to ensure the
functioning of the household deposit guarantee system and insolvent banks resolution. To exercise its main objective,
the DGF shall exercise the following functions as prescribed by this law [Deposit Guarantee Fund… 2016]:</p>
<ol>
<li>maintain a register of the DGF participants,</li>
<li>accumulate funds from the sources determined by Art. 19 of this Law, and control the completeness and the
timeliness of each DGF participant’s contributions payment,</li>
<li>invest the DGF funds in the government securities of Ukraine,</li>
<li>organize deposits payout in case of a decision regarding the withdrawal of the banking license or liquidation of a
bank,</li>
<li>regulate the participation of banks in the household deposits guarantee system,</li>
<li>take part in inspections of problem banks have upon a proposal of the National Bank of Ukraine,</li>
<li>apply financial sanctions and impose administrative fines to banks and their managers,</li>
<li>resolve insolvent banks through the provisional administration and liquidation of banks, transfer assets and
liabilities of an insolvent bank, sell an insolvent bank, or establish and sell a bridge bank,</li>
<li>audit banks to ensure their compliance with the household deposits guarantee system legislation,</li>
<li>provide financial support to an assuming bank,</li>
<li>forecast potential costs of the DGF for insolvent banks resolution and deposits payout.</li>
</ol>
<h2>2. Reforming the deposit guarantee system: protecting the interests of legal entities</h2>
<p>One of the main features which may characterize the system of national deposit guaranteeing are reimbursable
contributions of individuals, and that this function is assigned only to banks, excluding the possibility of its
implementation by other financial institutions.</p>
<p>There are many views on the formation and possible further improvement of the deposit guarantee system in Ukraine. We
believe we should pay attention to the discussion that unfolded in Ukraine and abroad based on the need to spread
guarantees refund of deposits and other categories of investors: individuals − entrepreneurs and legal entities.
Scientists (supporters of one or another position) are not always arguing their positions and analyzing the problem in
the narrow framework [Boichuk 2015].</p>
<p>Thus, according to the Russian scientist O. Turbanov: “Both individuals, individuals − entrepreneurs and legal
entities have equal rights of claims to the bank [...]. These subjects should have equal opportunities to protect
their rights, including at least a minimum level of guarantees to recover their deposits” [Turbanov (ed.) 2004]. The
undisputed fact is that the main task of deposit guaranteeing is the protection of the least financially educated
deposit holders (and those are actually individuals) from losing their money in case of bank insolvency. This is
actually admitted by the Financial Stability Forum [Pospelova 2007]. </p>
<p>This means that the primary function of the deposit guarantee system is the social function. However, this is not the
only feature that is inherent in the system. Also its economic component should be identified, which is to provide the
economy with financial resources including financial resources owned by individual entrepreneurs and legal entities.
The Financial Stability Forum<span><a id="footnote-10400-1-backlink" href="#footnote-10400-1">1</a></span> among the
major challenges that must be addressed in the system of bank deposits guarantees also defining the promoting
stability of financial system [The Financial Stability Forum 2016], which largely depends on individuals −
entrepreneurs and legal entities. </p>
<p>According to another Russian scientist – economist D. Kolchanov, “drawing on the legislation of Eastern Europe and
the Baltic countries the standards for facilities expansion of insurance coverage including the deposits of private
entrepreneurs will achieve the effect of incentives to increase savings activity, and will display one of the forms of
small business state support” [Kolchanov (ed.) 2007]. </p>
<p>Ukrainian scientist-economist V. Ogienko, justifying the necessity of extending the deposit guarantee system for
legal entities, recalls the same opportunity to strengthen the financial stability of commercial banks to increase the
capitalization of the Fund to reduce the risk of business activities. In this case, the extension of guarantees on
deposits of legal entities a scientist sees as the future development functions of the state guarantee to protect the
private property of citizens and entrepreneurs [Ogienko (ed.) 2005]. According to T. Mazur, a justification to extend
the deposit guarantee system to legal entities is wrong because it does not correspond to the objectives of
introducing deposit guarantee systems (such systems are not to reduce business risks, but in order to protect the
rights and interests of small depositors). Moreover, she considers that V. Ogienko did not take into account that such
an increase of the Fund capitalization, at the same time increases the amount of its possible costs. </p>
<p>The research of the international practice in this area confirms that there are two main models which are provided by
national legislation – narrow model, when guarantees are provided only for individual deposits (Russia, Belarus,
Moldova, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Turkey) and the wide one – when the guarantees are provided for both deposits
of individuals and of legal entities (Great Britain, Greece, Denmark, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Finland, France, Sweden)
(Table 1).</p>
<p>Thus as we can see we are drawing our system of deposit ensured from the legislation of Eastern Europe, which
provides guarantees only for household individual</p>
<p><span>Table 1. </span>Deposit guarantee models</p>
<table id="table-1" class="table table-bordered">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
<col />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Type of model</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Insurance coverage</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Countries</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Narrow model</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Individual (except individuals-private entrepreneurs/sole traders) depositors</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Russia, Belarus, Moldova, Latvia, <br />Lithuania, Macedonia, Turkey</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Wide model</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Individual (including individuals-<br />-private entrepreneurs/sole traders) depositors and legal entities
</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Great Britain, Greece, Denmark, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Finland, France, Sweden</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></p>
<p>
Source:	[http://forbes.net.ua/business/1397145-infografika-kak-rabotaet-garantirovanie-vkladov-<br />-v-raznyh-stranah].
</p>
<p>deposits. For example, according to aequo research company [aequo], a system of guarantees applies to all categories
of investors in the USA, Germany, Poland and other countries.</p>
<p>To compare the system of deposit guarantee in Ukraine using international experience we can analyze the main
characteristics shown in Tables 2, 3.</p>
<p><span>Table 2. </span>Sources of financing deposit guarantee system </p>
<table id="table-2" class="table table-bordered">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Argentina</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Private sector (regular fees and additional fees)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>United Kingdom</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Private sector (regular fees)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Germany</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Private sector (initial, regular and special charges)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Poland</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Private sector (initial and regular fees)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>USA</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Private sector (regular fees)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Japan</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Private sector (regular and extra fees), financial assistance from the state (in exceptional cases)</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Ukraine</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Private sector (initial, regular and special charges), financial assistance from the state (NBU loans)</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></p>
<p>Source: [International Association… 2016].</p>
<p>In Poland, such a system is realized through the Bank Guarantee Fund [Bank Guarantee Fund], which is non-government
in its status, but managed by the state. To perform the functions assigned to it, the financial resources fund is
managed, accumulated through the formation of special funds on the balance sheets of all banks − participants of the
deposit guarantee system. Mixed ownership on functional deposit protection system applied in this country allows the
body to maintain public confidence in it and at the same time ensures effective use of the banks involved for the
protection of deposits.</p>
<p>As it can be seen in Table 3, the amount of guaranteeing claims on deposits of individuals in Ukraine is much lower
than the guarantee in the compared countries. We should also consider the fact of guaranteeing deposits in the
national currency – hryvnia. Considering the exchange quotation on the market at the current rate, the</p>
<p><span>Table 3. </span>Guaranteeing deposits</p>
<table id="table-3" class="table table-bordered">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Argentina</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Guaranteeing claims of individual and legal depositors for certain categories <br />of deposits of up to
350,000 pesos (approx. 38,500 USD) per depositor.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>United <br />Kingdom</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Guaranteeing claims of individuals and certain categories of legal entities. Guaranteed amounts vary
depending on the requirements of categories (for example, for deposits up to 85,000 within a single creditor
at a single institution, for the requirements of pension savings without restrictions). Requirements are
guaranteed in pounds sterling.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Germany</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Guaranteeing claims of individuals and legal entities (with the exceptions) for the sum of 100,000 euros per
one creditor at single institution.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Poland</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Guaranteeing claims of individuals and legal entities (with the exceptions) for the sum of 100,000 euros per
one creditor at single institution.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>USA</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Guaranteeing claims of individuals, state, other categories of legal entities and their unions in the amount
up to 250,000 USD per one creditor at a single institution.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Japan</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Deposits in the national currency in the amount of up to 10 million yen per depositor in one institution.
Some deposits are guaranteed without any restrictions on the amount.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Ukraine</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Guaranteeing claims on deposits of individuals in the amount of 200,000 UAH per depositor per bank.</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></p>
<p>Source: [International Association… 2016]. </p>
<p>returned amount of guaranteeing claims is only about 6.7 thousand Euros, compared to 100 thousand – in EU countries.
But given the delay in returning deposits and increasing the exchange rate, the population faces the problem of
devaluation of the amounts of returned deposits.</p>
<h2>3. The expansion of the range of the Deposit Guarantee System − participants issue</h2>
<p>An interesting aspect of research is the deposit insurance spreading into the much wider range of financial
institutions compared to banks and other credit organizations and financial institutions. They include, for example,
credit unions, insurance companies, pension funds, mutual and investment funds, trust companies etc. Guaranteeing
deposits in such institutions in Ukraine can be considered as one of directions of further legislation development in
this area. </p>
<p>In comparison, the system of deposit guaranteeing in such countries as United Kingdom, Germany, Poland, USA and Japan
is provided not only by banks but by credit unions and other financial institutions as well (Table 4).</p>
<p>In the process of strengthening the bank deposits guaranteeing system under circumstances where it operates on a
regular and stable basis and its activity is established and well regulated, there is a tendency to expand coverage of
guarantee system and other financial institutions. The reason for this may be in the convergence</p>
<p><span>Table 4. </span>Participants of guarantee system </p>
<table id="table-4" class="table table-bordered">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Argentina</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Banks</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>United Kingdom</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Banks, insurance companies, investment companies</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Germany</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Banks, insurance companies</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Poland</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Banks, credit unions and some other financial institutions</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>USA</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Banks, insurance companies and other financial institutions</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Japan</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Banks and some other financial institutions</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Ukraine</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Banks</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></p>
<p>
Source:	[http://forbes.net.ua/business/1397145-infografika-kak-rabotaet-garantirovanie-vkladov-v-<br />raznyh-stranah;
International Association… 2016].</p>
<p>nature of commercial banks and other financial institutions, as well as the desire of the state to protect a wide
range of small depositors. </p>
<p>However, at the initial stage of forming a system providing guarantees to investors, the state should determine the
range of financial institutions, which it primarily intends to provide protection to. In our case, since banks are the
main financial intermediaries which attract deposits, make loans, make payments, and through which the monetary policy
of the state is implemented, they should have priority comparing with other financial institutions for the inclusion
into deposit insurance system. However, since the simultaneous attraction and placement of funds are performed by
other financial institutions, the negative effects of their insolvency can feel a significant part of depositors.
Therefore, considering the role they play in the financial system, these institutions may also be the subject to
guaranteeing. </p>
<p>In this regard, in “Guidelines for creating effective systems of deposit insurance” developed by The Financial
Stability Forum special attention is paid to the possible existence of different approaches to non-bank financial
institutions that attract deposits and work with other financial instruments [International Association… 2016]. There
is a number of arguments in favor of the membership distribution in the system of deposits guaranteeing for these
institutions: </p>
<ul>
<li>the intention to avoid the existence of distorted competition between different institutions offering similar
products,</li>
<li>the task of promoting the stability of the financial system by covering all institutions that attract deposits or
similar products,</li>
<li>the desire to spread the norms of prudential regulation and supervision to all institutions mentioned above
[International Association… 2016]. </li>
</ul>
<p>Today insurance companies, pension funds and credit unions successfully operate in the financial market in Ukraine.
All of these organizations in their activities require individual funds in various forms (by selling insurance
policies, pension contributions admission or membership fees). It should be noted that the individual funds
accumulated by insurance companies, pension funds and credit unions are growing, which in turn makes the issue of
protecting the rights and interests of these funds owners more actual. This is also due to the fact that the funds
accumulated by insurance companies, pension funds and credit unions are an important source of a domestic investment
in the economy. Deposits of credit institutions still remain the main direction of their placement. In this case, any
expression of banking crisis would inevitably impact on their solvency, and the fact that they are legal entities
means that the system of bank deposits guaranteeing is not extended on them. </p>
<p>EU Directive 94/19/EC of 14 May 1994 “On the system of deposit insurance” [Directive 94/19/EС of the European
Parliament…], which is substantially amended by Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of
16 April 2014 “On deposit guarantee schemes” [Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament…], provides deposit
guarantee for both physical and legal entities. However, the Directive also sets out a number of exceptions or
limitations to guaranteeing deposits of certain categories of depositors or deposits. The list of such exclusions is
clearly defined. Particularly according to paragraph 1, Art. 5 of Directive 2014/49/EU, Member States may decide that
certain depositors or deposits shall be excluded from guarantee or shall be granted a lower level of guarantee. The
list of exclusions includes: </p>
<ol>
<li>deposits made by other credit institutions on their own behalf and for their own account;</li>
<li>deposits arising out of transactions in connection with which there has been a criminal conviction for money
laundering;</li>
<li>deposits by financial institution;</li>
<li>deposits by investment firms;</li>
<li>deposits the holder of which has never been identified pursuant to Article 9 (1) of Directive 2005/60/EC, when
they have become unavailable;</li>
<li>deposits by insurance undertakings and by reinsurance undertakings;</li>
<li>deposits by collective investment undertakings;</li>
<li>deposits by pension and retirement funds;</li>
<li>deposits by public authorities;</li>
<li>debt securities issued by a credit institution and liabilities arising out of own acceptances and promissory
notes.</li>
</ol>
<p>In view of the changes that should come about in the financial and credit system of Ukraine and affect the problems
of the Deposit Guarantee Fund from January 01 2017, we should note the following.</p>
<p>Firstly, a number of financial institutions will move from the National Commission for Regulation of Financial
Services Markets that is liquidated as a regulator of the financial market to the National Bank of Ukraine (NBU) and
the National Securities and Stock Market Commission (NSSMSC). Specifically, credit unions (CU) will be moved to the
National Bank, a regulator of their financial and credit activities.</p>
<p>Secondly, as it results from the first statement, the National Bank traditionally works with commercial banks, which,
in contrast to the credit unions, operate with loans and deposits. On the other hand, credit unions, which also
provide loans, can operate without deposits, using the shares of their members as credit resources. Here exists a
conflict that does not happen in the practice of commercial banks. It is because credit unions which did not receive a
license for deposit operations, do not have to cooperate with the Deposit Guarantee Fund, as the shares of its members
are not related to deposits. </p>
<p>The question is whether there is a need to establish the mandatory cooperation with the Deposit Guarantee Fund for
credit unions. Or otherwise: is there a financial rationale for the formation of any such a fund to ensure the safety
of members of the CU shares? </p>
<p>The answer has to be given through clarifying the experts’ misunderstanding of credit cooperation nature and
objectives.</p>
<p>Indeed, in Ukraine, especially among specialists of banks and in a certain circle of financiers, not once has been
put forward the idea to bring credit unions to the same operating rules as banks. Even to this day there is a lack of
understanding of the specifics of the credit cooperative union origin and functioning as a number of stakeholders in a
kind of union do not resolve common problems. A consequence of this lack of understanding can be considered the
election of NBU as a regulator for this segment of the financial market. However, the election of the NBU as a
regulator of credit unions is the correct decision on condition of reduction in the number of regulators since the
central bank of the state is certainly closer functionally to CU than the National Securities and Stock Market
Commission.</p>
<p>The authors have clarified in scientific publications the nature and specific problems of credit unions in general
and particularly in Ukraine [Alieksieiev, Alieksieieva 2011]. There are enough other research publications on this
topic, which not only showed the specificity of credit cooperation institutions, but also justified the need to reckon
with a particular form of participation of the CU founders to use accumulated credit and the resulting distribution of
income.</p>
<p>In general, credit unions should be viewed not as competitors to other credit institutions, but as an association of
founders for which it is economically impractical to obtain not very large loans with too high bank interest rates. In
return, with the help of credit cooperation, i.e. through credit mutual assistance, some individuals − private
entrepreneurs, perhaps even a limited liability companies, let alone ordinary householders, can solve simple financial
problems.</p>
<p>According to the official information of the National Commission for Regulation of Financial Services Markets for
2016 the number of registered CU was 462 (for comparison: in 2014 there were 627 and in 2015 – 588)
[http://nfp.gov.ua/content/…]. There is a slow reduction in the number of credit unions and their members (in 2014 –
878.7 thousand members; 2015 – 775.0 thousand members; 2016 – 674.1 thousand members of CU). When the total assets of
the CU in 2016 decreased by 4.0% compared to 2015, the total amount of capital increased by 14.2% [<a
href="http://uncua.com/">Ukrainian National…</a> 2017]. It can be viewed, on the one hand, as reducing the presence
of CU on the credit market, but, on the other one, as strengthening the financial condition of some CU and credit
cooperation in general. </p>
<p>On May 1, 2017 in Ukraine there were 87 liquidated banks, 32 banks where depositors received payments, 4 banks with
the interim administration, 1 bank sold to investors and 1 bank sold to the state. </p>
<p>Dynamics of Deposit Guarantee Fund activity in 2015-2017 is shown in Table 5.</p>
<p><span>Table 5. </span>Data on deposits of individuals in DGF member banks in 2015-2017</p>
<table id="table-5" class="table table-bordered">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
<col />
<col />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td rowspan="2">
<p>Indicators</p>
</td>
<td colspan="3">
<p>Date</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>01.01.2017</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>01.01.2016</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>01.01.2015</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>The amount of deposits of individuals, billion UAH</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>382.1</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>362.3</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>382.1</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Number of deposits, million</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>41.1</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>44.7</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>46.5</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>The average amount of the deposit, UAH</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>9,298</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>8,104</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>8,213</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>The percentage of coverage for number of depositors, %</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>98.6</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>98.8</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>98.7</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>DGF financial resources, million UAH</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>15,315.9</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>14,084.4</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>16,872.60</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Paid out to depositors, million UAH</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>80,865.5</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>65,929.8</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>–</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></p>
<p>*Calculation does not include: JSСB “Kiev” (assets and liabilities were transferred), JSC “Omega Bank” (bridge bank
was established) and PJSC “ASTRA BANK” (100% shares of the insolvent bank was sold to an investor); **Calculation
includes: money paid out to depositors of insolvent banks be-<br />fore transfer of assets and liabilities to
assuming/bridge bank: OJSC CB “PROMEKONOMBANK”, JSC “BANK GOLDEN GATE” and PJSC “TERRA BANK”.</p>
<p>Source: [Deposit Guarantee… 2016].</p>
<p>One should also emphasize a small share of the credit unions on the financial market, compared with commercial banks.
According to official information of NBU at May 1, 2017 there were 90 banks (excluding insolvent) in Ukraine, 38 of
which were banks with foreign capital. The data to compare credit cooperation system with the banking system of
Ukraine are presented in Table 6.</p>
<p><span>Table 6. </span>The indicators of Ukrainian banking system and credit unions, according to the National
Commission for Regulation of Financial Services Markets</p>
<table id="table-6" class="table table-bordered">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
<col />
<col />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p><a id="Zakotwiczenie" />Indicators</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Banks of Ukraine,</p>
<p>31.12.2016</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Credit unions, </p>
<p>31.12.2016</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>CU to banks indicator ratio, %</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Assets, million UAH</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>1,212,812</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>2,032.5</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>0.168</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Capital, million UAH</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>120,038 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>1,044.4</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>0.87</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></p>
<p>Source: [Credit Union...].</p>
<p>Obviously, credit unions occupy a very small proportion of the financial market through their too small financial
capacity. Instead, they are useful at least to 674.1 thousand of its members.</p>
<p>Comparing the state of credit cooperation in Ukraine, Poland and in Europe as a whole, we can present the following
data (Table 7).</p>
<p><span>Table 7. </span>Indices of Credit Unions activity in Ukraine, Poland and Europe, at January 01, 2016</p>
<table id="table-7" class="table table-bordered">
<colgroup>
<col />
<col />
<col />
<col />
</colgroup>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Indices of Activity</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Ukraine</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Poland</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Europe</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Number of CU</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>588</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>48</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>2,220</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Number of members</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>764,600</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>2,072,598</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>8,351,249</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Assets (USD)</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>86,981,987</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>3,172,133,560</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>23,306,191,972</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Penetration *</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>2.5%</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>7.7%</p>
</td>
<td>
<p>3.4%</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>* The penetration ratio is calculated as the number of credit union members to the economically active population
aged from 15 to 64 years.</p>
<p>Source: [Credit Union...].</p>
<p>The comparison of the system of credit cooperation in Ukraine, Poland and Europe as a whole demonstrates the
Ukrainian system significant backlog, although the need to provide credit services in Ukraine is quite high, given the
low incomes of individuals. However, low income is exactly one of the reasons for the weak crediting development not
only for CU, but also for banks. In fact small official household incomes limit credit institutions in granting loans
possibilities. From the perspective of the creditor, people with low incomes have weak solvency and repayment of
loans. Then it has a probable interest in such borrowers as commercial banks and the Households Deposit Guarantee
Fund. Instead, such a contingent of borrowers can find support in CU, albeit in small-scale loans usually to meet
their consumer needs.</p>
<h2>4. Conclusions</h2>
<p>In summary, it is worth noting that the practical implementation of the defined measures is possible only through a
phased adoption of many legislative and regulatory changes.</p>
<p>In Ukraine, the implementation of such a move is also possible, but we need to prepare necessary conditions, in
particular, strengthening the Guarantee Fund as the center of administrative influence, and entering the
differentiation of contributions from banks and investors of a progressive size compensation.</p>
<p>Weighing all the arguments “for” and “against” on the dissemination guarantees on deposits of individuals ‒
entrepreneurs and legal entities we should not forget about the processes of integration of Ukraine with Europe, which
is an essential part of bringing domestic laws of the country in line with EU legislation. </p>
<p>Recalling partly the strengthening of DGF can be solved by The Law of Ukraine No. 629-VIII [The Law of Ukraine, “On
Amendments…] adopted by Parliament, as well as other regulations that are developed today. However, given the repeated
negative experience of individuals, businesses and investors associated with the Ukrainian financial system, in the
future there would be a change of the operating principle of the guarantee system, including the mandatory expansion
of the system for legal entities.</p>
<p>Ukraine is the member of certain international organizations, such as The International Association of Deposit
Insurers, Federal Deposit Insurance (USA), European Forum of Deposit Insurers, etc. Thus we have all possibilities to
reform our system of deposit guaranteeing basing on the insuring deposit system of well-developed countries, which can
provide stability and strength of financial and bank system in whole.</p>
<p>There are certain international legislation acts which should be taken into account while developing and elaborating
national legislation in this sphere:</p>
<ul>
<li>Core Principles for Effective Deposit Insurance System (collaborated, agreed and published by The International
Association of deposit insurers in 2014) [IADI 2014];</li>
<li>the Directive of the European Parliament and the Council (the legal provisions of the Act on BGF in Poland are in
full compliance).</li>
</ul>
<p>From the financial and legal point of view there should be certain prerequisites for the practical implementation of
distribution guarantees on deposits of individuals ‒ entrepreneurs and legal entities, the main of which is the
availability of fund resources. When deciding on the extension of the guarantee, the financial capabilities of both
the state and most credit institutions should also be taken into account, since the guarantee fund is formed at the
expense of their means.</p>
<p>References</p>
<p>aequo / Advising EBRD on the reform of <a href="file:///G:\Вроцлав\Deposit Guarantee Fund">Deposit Guarantee
Fund</a>, https://aequo.com.ua/projects/aequo_advises_ebrd_on_the_reform_of_deposit_guarantee_fund.</p>
<p>Alieksieiev I., Aliksieieva S., 2011, Kreditnye sojuzy Ukrainy: priroda i problemy, Business Inform., no. 2, vol. 1,
pp. 34-36.</p>
<p>Bank Guarantee Fund, https://www.bfg.pl.</p>
<p>Boichuk T., 2015, The Legal regulation of guaranteeing and savings restoration in Ukraine, the ma-<br />nuscript for
the scientific degree of the Candidate of Science of Law, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv.</p>
<p>Credit Union Association Bulletin, http://www.unascu.org.ua/bulletin/61.pdf.</p>
<p>Deposit Guarantee Fund of Ukraine, 2016, http://www.fg.gov.ua/en.</p>
<p>Directive 94/19/EС of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 May 1994 on deposit guarantees schemes, Official
Journal, L 135.</p>
<p>Directive 2014/49/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 16 April 2014 on deposit guarantee schemes,
Official Journal of the European Union, 12.6.2014, L 173/149.</p>
<p><a
href="http://forbes.net.ua/business/1397145-infografika-kak-rabotaet-garantirovanie-vkladov-v-raznyh-stranah">http://forbes.net.ua/business/1397145-infografika-kak-rabotaet-garantirovanie-vkladov-v-raznyh-stranah</a>.
</p>
<p>http://nfp.gov.ua/content/richni-zviti-nackomfinposlug.html.</p>
<p>IADI Core Principles for Effective Deposit Insurance Systems, 2014, <a
href="http://www.iadi.org/en/assets/File/Core Principles/cprevised2014nov.pdf">http://www.iadi.org/en/assets/File/Core%20Principles/cprevised2014nov.pdf</a>.
</p>
<p>International Association of Deposit Insurers, 2016, http://www.iadi.org/en.</p>
<p>Kolchanov D. (ed.), 2007, The system of compulsory bank deposits insurance and the mechanism of its realization, the
thesis for the scientific degree of the Candidate of Science of Economics, Tumen, p. 24.</p>
<p>National Bank of Ukraine, 2016, https://bank.gov.ua.</p>
<p>Ogienko V. (ed.), 2005, The households deposit guarantee system in Ukraine, the manuscript for the scientific degree
of the Candidate of Science of Economics, Lviv, p. 19.</p>
<p>Pospelova M., 2007, Will the deposit guarantee system be effective? <a
href="http://allpravo.ru/library/doc99p0/instrum5281/item5282.html">http://allpravo.ru/library/doc99p0/instrum5281/item5282.html</a>.
</p>
<p>Pozhar A. (ed.), 2013, Kredytno-kooperatyvnyi Sector Ekonomiky Evropeiskyh Krain, RWC PUET, Poltava, p. 278.</p>
<p>Pyshnyi A., 2006, Deposit Guarantee System: Reforms are necessary and inevitable, <a
href="http://gazeta.zn.ua/ECONOMICS/sistema_garantirovaniya_vkladov_reformy_neobhodimy_i_neizbezhny.html">http://gazeta.zn.ua/ECONOMICS/sistema_garantirovaniya_vkladov_reformy_neobhodimy_i_neizbezhny.html</a>.
</p>
<p>The Financial Stability Forum (FSF), 2016, <a href="http://www.fsb.org">http://www.fsb.org</a>.</p>
<p>The Law of Ukraine, “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine (on Improvement of the Deposit Guarantee
System and Removal of Insolvent Banks from the Market)” of July 16, 2015, Ref. number 629-VIII, <a
href="http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/629-viii">http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/629-viii</a>.</p>
<p>The Law of Ukraine, “On Households Deposit Guarantee System” of February 23, 2012, Ref. number 4452-VI, <a
href="http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4452-17">http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/4452-17</a>.</p>
<p>Turbanov A. (ed.), 2004, Financial and legal bases of creation and functioning of the deposit insurance system in the
Russian Federation, the thesis for the scientific degree of The Doctor of Science of Law, Moscow, p. 47.</p>
<p><a href="http://uncua.com/">Ukrainian National Credit Union Association</a>: Credit Union Association Bulletin, 2017,
<a href="http://www.unascu.org.ua/bulletin/61.pdf">http://www.unascu.org.ua/bulletin/61.pdf</a>.</p>
<p><span>ADAPTACJA </span>MIĘDZYNARODOWEGO DOŚWIADCZENIA<br />DO SYSTEMU gwarantowaniA wkŁadów na Ukrainie </p>
<p><span>Streszczenie: </span>Celem badania było uzasadnienie metodologicznych i technicznych zaleceń o udoskonaleniu
systemu gwarantowania wkładów na Ukrainie ze względu na doświadczenie międzynarodowe. Obiektem badania było zarządanie
systemem gwarantowania wkładów w ramach reformowania ustawodawstwa Ukrainy, skierowanego na utworzenie mechanizmu
gwarantowania wkładów. W trakcie badania zostały wykorzystane następujące metody: metoda dialektyczna oraz metody
analizy i syntezy – badania osobliwości systemu gwarantowania wkładów państw rozwiniętych, charakterystyka mechanizmu
zwrotu depozytów oraz osobliwości prawa międzynarodowego; metoda statystyczna – analiza wskaźników systemu bankowego
na Ukrainie oraz unii kredytowych (UK), w celu empirycznego ustalenia korelacji wskaźników UK i banków; analiza
strukturalna i logiczna – rozwój teoretycznych oraz metodologicznych zasad kształtowania skutecznego mechanizmu
gwarantowania wkładów na Ukrainie. Zbadano konieczność zapewnienia udziału w systemie gwarantowania depozytów nie
tylko osób fizycznych, a także przedsiębiorców i osób prawnych. To sprzyja rozwojowi małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw
w kraju. Przeanalizowano osobliwości działalności unii kredytowych na Ukrainie w kontekście reformowania systemu
bankowego. Uzasadniono możliwość włączenia unii kredytowych do systemu gwarantowania wkładów na Ukrainie na
przykładzie państw UE i świata. Scharakteryzowano niezbędne korekty do ustawodawstwa krajowego dotyczącego zakresu
gwarantowania wkładów oraz zaoferowano skuteczne mechanizmy ich spełnienia.</p>
<p><span>Słowa kluczowe:</span> system gwarantowania wkładów, fundusz gwarantowania wkładów, wkłady osób fizycznych,
gwarantowanie wkładów, unie kredytowe (UK).</p>
<div class="footnotes">
<div>
<p><a id="footnote-10400-1" href="#footnote-10400-1-backlink">1</a><span
class="char-style-override-1">	</span>The Financial Stability Forum (FSF) was a group consisting of major
national financial authorities such as <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finance_ministry">finance
ministries</a>, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_bank">central bankers</a>, and international
financial bodies. 24 October 2016 was held the Eleventh Meeting of the Financial Stability Board Regional
Consultative Group for Europe. On 28 August 2013, the FSB published a consultative document on an <a
href="http://www.fsb.org/2013/08/r_130828/">Assessment Methodology for the Key Attributes of Effective
Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions</a>: http://www.fsb.org/2013/08/r_130828.</p>
</div>
</div>